Still soft and stretchy Dinosaur soft tissue find—a stunning rebuttal of “millions of years”

These God damned Creationists never give up!

You can argue with them until you're blue in the face, and they wll still cling to their beliefs against all common sense, or just make something up that supports their point of view!

In this case, Dr. Carl starts off with AN OUTRIGHT LIE......., and then he runs with it from there!

---------------------------------------------------------

By Dr Carl Wieland, AiG–Australia

We previously announced the discovery of what seemed to be microscopic red blood cells (and immunological evidence of hemoglobin) in dinosaur bone. Not only have more blood cells been found, but also soft, fibrous tissue, and complete blood vessels. The fact that this really is unfossilized soft tissue from a dinosaur is in this instance so obvious to the naked eye that any scepticism directed at the previous discovery dispelled!

The exciting discovery was apparently made when researchers were forced to break open the leg bone of a Tyrannosaurus rex fossil to lift it by helicopter. The bone was still largely hollow and not filled up with minerals as is usual. Dr Schweitzer used chemicals to dissolve the bony matrix, revealing the soft tissue still present.4

It appears that this sort of thing has not been found before mainly because it was never looked for. Schweitzer was probably alert to the possibility because of her previous serendipitous discovery of T. rex blood cells. (It appears that the fossils were sent to her to look for soft tissues, prior to preservative being applied, because of her known interest.) In fact, Schweitzer has since found similar soft tissue in several other dinosaur specimens!

That’s just what appears to have happened in this case. When Schweitzer first found what appeared to be blood cells in a T. Rex specimen, she said, “It was exactly like looking at a slice of modern bone. But, of course, I couldn’t believe it. I said to the lab technician: “The bones, after all, are 65 million years old.

How could blood cells survive that long?’”

Conventional wisdom among paleontologists states that when dinosaurs died and became fossilized, soft tissues didn’t preserve – the bones were essentially transformed into “rocks” through a gradual replacement of all organic material by minerals.

New research by a North Carolina State University paleontologist, however, could literally turn that theory inside out.

I invite the reader to step back and contemplate the obvious.

This discovery gives immensely powerful support to the proposition that dinosaur fossils are not millions of years old at all, but were mostly fossilized under catastrophic conditions a few thousand years ago at most.

Read more H E R E

------------------------------------------------------------

You see what this lying son-of-a-bitch has done eh?

He starts out with a false statement that soft tissue has been found in dinasour bones......., and then draws a natural, and in that case, true conclusion that they must only be thousand of years old, not millions.

Ya gotta watch out for these Creationists type kids, they'll whiz ya faster than you can blink your eye!>